Psychologists studying religiosity and spirituality (R/S) often face several challenges when conducting their research, such as collecting data from nationally representative samples, cross-cultural generalizability, statistical power, and integrated multilevel approaches. We examined one potential solution—the use of Representative, Open-Access Datasets (ROADs), which are currently underutilized. In this article, we define ROADs; discuss affordances, obstacles, and best practices in using them; document the R/S variables available in various waves of ongoing ROADs collection efforts; and delineate ways to increase usage of ROADs as a research tool in the future. This will enhance the capability of psychologists to address theory-driven questions and to better understand the role of R/S in everyday life, including social attitudes, health, and well-being, as well as social change, cohesion, and conflict. Looking forward, we recommend (a) adding more, and more nuanced, variables to future ROADs data collection efforts; (b) publishing more frequently using ROADs data; and (c) conducting workshops to promote the use of ROADs and to train researchers in secondary data analysis techniques.
View External SiteTopics
- Charity2
 - Corruption115
 - COVID-1969
 - Democracy40
 - Discrimination14
 - Economy228
 - Education52
 - Environment37
 - Extremism19
 - Freedoms51
 - Gender Issues160
 - Governance255
 - Health45
 - International Relations195
 - Labor Market36
 - Media31
 - Migration64
 - Political Institutions214
 - Political Participation35
 - Political Systems63
 - Refugees6
 - Religion118
 - Security34
 - Social Justice45
 - Wellbeing2
 - Youth76